Formalization: Outcome Annotation and Minimax Risk for Discrete Average Treatment Effects
The complete Lean development behind this paper — every definition, lemma, and theorem of its module, including helpers the paper text never cites. Identifiers link within this page, into the Causalean library, or out to the official Mathlib docs. Note: this index was generated at a different commit than the paper's audited pin (db544e5) — statements may have moved since the audit.
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Basic 53 declarations This file defines the finite two-sample experiment, its potential-outcome overlay, the observed-data ATE functional, and the two minimax risks used by the annotation-frontier results.
Semi-supervised discrete ATE annotation frontier
This file defines the finite two-sample experiment, its potential-outcome overlay, the observed-data ATE functional, and the two minimax risks used by the annotation-frontier results. The finite PMF presentation is intentional: the Causalean PO and minimax APIs are measure-theoretic and kernel-indexed, whereas this paper needs an explicit finite labeled/auxiliary product law.
One complete record (X,A,Y) on the finite alphabet. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
One outcome-unlabeled record (X,A). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
A law of a complete finite record.
The measure associated with a finite observed-data law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
The probability mass of one complete atom. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The covariate-cell mass P(X=x). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The treatment-covariate cell mass P(X=x,A=a). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The propensity, totalized to zero when P(X=x)=0. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The binary outcome regression, totalized to zero on a null arm-cell. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The outcome-marked cell mass P(X=x,A=a,Y=1). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The treatment-covariate marginal PMF. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The canonical labeled product law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The canonical auxiliary product law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The joint sample space. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Positive-mass cells have propensity in the fixed overlap band. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The supplied labeled sample law is the iid product generated by P. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The supplied auxiliary law is iid from the same population's (X,A) marginal. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The supplied joint probability law factorizes into its labeled and auxiliary marginals. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The canonical independent annotation law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Full-data atom (X,A,Y,Y(0),Y(1)). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
A finite potential-outcome law.
The mass of a full-data atom. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Consistency: atoms violating Y=Y(A) have zero mass. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The (X,A,Y(0),Y(1)) atom mass after summing out observed Y. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The finite cross-multiplied form of (Y(0),Y(1)) independent of A given X. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The observed (X,A,Y) marginal of a potential-outcome law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Membership in the unrestricted finite law class includes the paper's full parameter domain.
Definition (Lean source)
A law bundled with membership in the overlap class. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The observed-data ATE functional sum_x p_x (mu_1x-mu_0x). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Under overlap the ATE functional is in [-1,1]. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Consistency, exchangeability and overlap identify the observed functional. the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Laws in the two-sample experiment, with all three sampling atoms explicit. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The canonical product law belongs to the annotation experiment. the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Mean squared error under a supplied two-sample law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Infimum measurable-estimator, supremum overlap-law MSE in the canonical annotation experiment. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The canonical minimax risk has the paper's stated range. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The logarithmic scale log(e n). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The explicit unequal-information annotation-frontier rate. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The exact treatment-covariate probability table. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The known-marginal observation space. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The exact table associated with P. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The benchmark experiment supplying labeled data and the exact (X,A) table. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Projection of a real decision into the target's known range [-1,1]. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Clipping any measurable known-marginal estimator is measurable, remains in [-1,1], and cannot increase squared loss against any legal ATE target. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Minimax MSE when the exact treatment-covariate table is supplied. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.AlternationDuality 2 declarations Finite alternation duality for the rational target p/(p+a).
Finite alternation duality for the rational target p/(p+a).
A finitely supported signed measure, presented by its nodes and signed weights.
Definition (Lean source)
Positive constants depending only on overlap yield a normalized finite signed measure with vanishing moments through degree L and a uniform rational gap. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.AnnotationFrontierConsequences 4 declarations
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.ChebyshevCalibration 10 declarations Chebyshev continuations and their explicit factorial-moment calibration.
Chebyshev continuations and their explicit factorial-moment calibration.
The shifted Chebyshev polynomial Q_L(z)=T_L(1-2z). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Polynomial continuation of (1-Q_L)/(2L²). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Polynomial continuation of H_L(z)/z. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Polynomial continuation of (1-E_L(z))/z. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Coefficient ℓ¹ norm of a real polynomial. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Coefficientwise bivariate falling-factorial lift of (s₀+s₁)G_L(s_a/B)/B. Each monomial is lifted separately, so the same-arm contribution uses (K_a)_{j+1} rather than K_a (K_a)_j. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The explicit second moment under independent Poisson cell counts. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
All coefficient, factorial-moment, and interval inequalities (C7)--(C9). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
For a positive polynomial degree, the coefficient ℓ¹ norm of the shifted Chebyshev quotient is at most six to that degree.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The explicit shifted-Chebyshev construction satisfies (C7)--(C9). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalCalibration 9 declarations Arithmetic closure of the common-marginal C55 calibration.
Arithmetic closure of the common-marginal C55 calibration.
The logarithmic schedule is positive at every nonempty sample size. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
The logarithmic schedule is at most twice the square-root scale. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
The logarithmic schedule is at most the sample size. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
Above one, taking a natural floor preserves at least half the input. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
A ceiling of the calibrated logarithmic degree costs at most one extra copy of the logarithmic schedule. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The canonical degree is at least two. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Outside the parametric regime, the capped rare-cell count dominates the square of the approximation degree at the variance-absorption scale. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Either side of the capped rare-cell count supplies the corresponding dimension-rate lower bound. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalFiniteLaw 36 declarations Explicit finite control-zero laws used by the common-marginal prior.
Explicit finite control-zero laws used by the common-marginal prior.
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalPoissonPrior 4 declarations Scale specialization of the common-marginal rare-cell prior.
Scale specialization of the common-marginal rare-cell prior.
The generalized all-bandwidth realization interface supplied by the uniform-intensity construction.
Definition (Lean source)
A witness produced at an explicitly named exact bandwidth scale. Keeping the numerator constant and denominator as indices of the witness lets the uniform Poisson specialization use bε L / (u + v), while the C55 fixed-sample construction uses the different, paper-facing scale b₀ L / (n + m). Both remain strictly narrower than the inequality-only CommonMarginalPoissonPriorWitness.
Definition (Lean source)
Quantitative closure of the canonical C55 recipe. These are outputs of the epsilon-only calibration construction, rather than premises imposed on the fixed-sample transfer or on the converse. Every clause refers to the single exact-bandwidth recipe stored in H.
Definition (Lean source)
The exact B = bε L / (u + v) specialization of the uniform-intensity common-marginal construction. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalPoissonReindex 5 declarations Finite reindexing identities for the common-marginal Poisson experiment.
Finite reindexing identities for the common-marginal Poisson experiment.
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Regroup the five rare-cell counts into the Boolean arm table used by the raw experiment. the stated conclusion.
Inserting a deterministic zero coordinate commutes with a binary product law. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The nested five-factor product, after regrouping, is exactly the two-arm product law. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalPoissonTransport 20 declarations Countable Poisson splitting and total-variation transport helpers.
Countable Poisson splitting and total-variation transport helpers.
Total variation contracts under a common Markov kernel. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Post-processing commutes with formation of a prior-predictive law. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Prior-predictive TV depends only on the pointwise difference of kernel masses. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Given a total count, split it according to a binomial draw. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
The binomial splitting law as a countable-state Markov kernel. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
Splitting a Poisson count binomially produces two independent Poisson counts. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Apply the same countable-state kernel independently in finitely many coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Applying a kernel coordinatewise at an input array equals the product measure of its coordinatewise applications.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
A one-coordinate TV bound tensorizes across an i.i.d. finite product. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Split only the aggregate control coordinate of a marked-Poisson observation. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
The marked-Poisson law after control splitting, with all five raw rates exposed. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Pad an injectively indexed family and one distinguished coordinate by a fixed value on all unused coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Coordinate laws corresponding to finitePadding. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Pad an injectively indexed finite product and one distinguished coordinate by a fixed value on all unused coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A binary product, written as a Boolean-indexed random function. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalPrior 22 declarations Auxiliary-invariant fuzzy priors and their uniform-intensity certificate.
Auxiliary-invariant fuzzy priors and their uniform-intensity certificate.
This declaration defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
Raw cell counts: independent labeled Y=1 and Y=0 counts, followed by the auxiliary (X,A) count. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The explicit raw marked-Poisson law of one normalized finite law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The load-bearing constants chosen once for a fixed overlap level. The handle bandwidth is the paper's b₀, while uniformBandwidthConstant is the larger bε allowance used by the uniform-intensity construction.
Definition (Lean source)
A pair of priors at one realized finite-atom scale. The epsilon-only calibration is fixed before the instance indices; L, B, a, and k are indices of the recipe rather than consequences of a canonical n + m scale.
Definition (Lean source)
The law of the random full treatment-covariate table under a prior. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Center of the unnormalized target induced directly from the atom generator. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Variance of the unnormalized mass or target over the atom generator. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
A quantitative certificate for one common-marginal rare-cell recipe.
Definition (Lean source)
Provenance certificate for a realized finite-atom scale produced by the common-marginal Poisson-prior construction.
Definition (Lean source)
The null or alternative prior belonging to an arbitrary calibrated recipe. This projection is used by the scale-robust Poisson lemmas; the paper-facing commonMarginalPriorOf below additionally enforces the regime and C55 scales. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The low-dimensional branch in the paper's regime-dependent prior handle. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
A paper-facing prior handle. It stores one recipe, chosen only after the /-- This declaration defines the specified object. -/ instance indices, and pins its branch and all four approximation-dual scales to the formulas in the note. In particular, C55 uses the treatment--covariate information size n + m; the fixed-sample multiplier does not enter this bandwidth.
Definition (Lean source)
The null or alternative prior from the uniquely supplied regime-dependent handle. Both branches project from the identical calibrated recipe. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The exact labeled intensity used by the fixed-sample coupling. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The exact auxiliary intensity used by the fixed-sample coupling. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The C55 lower-bound separation attached to the recipe stored in H. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The dimension-dependent part of the annotation-frontier rate. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Quantitative facts retained from the explicit epsilon-only calibration.
Definition (Lean source)
Uniform-intensity rare-cell priors have overlap, identical random (X,A) tables, separated target centers, controlled variance, and label-gated mixture distance. The returned calibration also exports the degree floor and the C55 bandwidth slack already used by its construction. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalProductBounds 4 declarations Product-measure variance bounds used by the common-marginal construction.
Product-measure variance bounds used by the common-marginal construction.
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalTransfer 4 declarations Fixed-sample common-marginal transfer and its canonical calibrated family.
Fixed-sample common-marginal transfer and its canonical calibrated family.
Fixed-sample transfer for one exact witness of the Poisson-prior construction, with the labeled and auxiliary intensities fixed at the two unequal sample-size scales from the paper. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Under the stated overlap, positivity, sample-size, witness, affinity, and variance conditions, the recipe's squared raw-center separation gives the stated fixed-sample minimax-risk lower bound.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The fixed-sample risk transfer for every supplied uniform-intensity recipe. The variance-bound constant is universal, and the concentration threshold may depend on it and on eps. The recipe is not selected here: both the exact bε L / (u + v) specialization and C55 recipes allowed by the bandwidth inequality are covered through CommonMarginalPoissonPriorWitness. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A single construction chain chooses the fixed intensity and risk constants first, then an epsilon-only calibration and its variance-absorption threshold, and finally constructs, for every instance, one paper-facing handle together with a certificate for that very same recipe. The transfer rule recorded beside the family is the rule proved by fixed_sample_common_marginal_transfer, so the producer and consumer use the identical constants at their respective quantifier levels. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalTransferConcentration 10 declarations Mass, target, event, tail, and fuzzy-hypothesis bounds for common-marginal transfer.
Mass, target, event, tail, and fuzzy-hypothesis bounds for common-marginal transfer.
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalTransferReconstruction 9 declarations Raw-count reindexing, ordered Poisson kernels, and predictive reconstruction.
Raw-count reindexing, ordered Poisson kernels, and predictive reconstruction.
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The nested count-table encoding used by the common-marginal construction is canonically equivalent to a pair of labeled and auxiliary histograms. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Reindexing the recipe's nested raw count law gives the generic paired independent-Poisson histogram law consumed by histogram reconstruction. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Reindexing the nested raw counts and reconstructing the two ordered Poisson samples is a common Markov channel, so it contracts the distance between the recipe's two prior-predictive laws. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.CommonMarginalTransferRisk 13 declarations Loss, clipping, and minimax-risk bridges for common-marginal transfer.
Loss, clipping, and minimax-risk bridges for common-marginal transfer.
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.Estimator 23 declarations The finite mixed-information hybrid estimator and its calibration data.
The finite mixed-information hybrid estimator and its calibration data.
Explicit factorial-moment constant. the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Degree calibration constant. the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Least dyadic index whose inverse power is below the overlap constant. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Dyadic lower approximation to the overlap constant. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Least integer satisfying the four numerical inequalities in (C1). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Deterministic labeled/auxiliary block sizes from (C2).
The ordered split sizes used by the estimator. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Binary length 1+clog₂ n. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Polynomial degree in (C3). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Pilot/factorial bandwidth in (C3). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Pilot heavy-cell threshold in (C3). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The exact finite conjunction (C4)--(C6). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
Count complete records in a prefix of the block beginning at offset. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Count auxiliary records in a prefix of the block beginning at offset. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Arm count in a labeled block, summing over the binary outcome mark. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Count one arm in a pooled block ordered as its labeled part followed by its auxiliary part. This makes pilot and factorial prefixes disjoint. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Clip a real number to [-1,1]. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
A finite valid-prefix output using separate outcome, pilot, and factorial pools. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Conditional finite Poisson-prefix average of the clipped mixed statistic. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The retained mass of a finite Poisson prefix is at most one. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.FactorialCertificate 1 declarations A universal-constant packaging of the Chebyshev factorial certificate.
A universal-constant packaging of the Chebyshev factorial certificate.
For every degree at least two, the continuations obey (C9), have the stated degree, and use one universal factorial-lift moment constant. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.FiniteSmallInstance 42 declarations The explicit two-cell diagnostic calculation.
The explicit two-cell diagnostic calculation.
The null diagnostic law is uniform on (X,A) and has outcome zero. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The alternative diagnostic law changes only the treated outcome in cell zero. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The explicit null law in the two-cell diagnostic. the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The explicit alternative law in the two-cell diagnostic. the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The displayed n=m=1 mixed indicator statistic. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The prescribed laws and identities comprising the finite diagnostic calculation.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
This declaration defines the specified object.
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
This declaration defines the specified object.
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The explicit d=2, epsilon=1/4, n=m=1 common-marginal calculation. the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.FixedSampleHybridTransfer 1 declarations Transfer of the Poisson hybrid to the fixed two-sample experiment.
Transfer of the Poisson hybrid to the fixed two-sample experiment.
The deterministic fixed-sample implementation costs at most a factor two and an additive order-1/n overflow term. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridBlockCalibration 7 declarations Exact arithmetic for the deterministic labeled/auxiliary block split.
Exact arithmetic for the deterministic labeled/auxiliary block split.
Integer form of the uniform quarter/three-quarter block bounds. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The deterministic intensities satisfy all ratio bounds in C15. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Multiplication by the calibrated bandwidth cancels its positive minimum denominator. This form is convenient for all three tail tests. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
When the unrounded pilot scale is at least eight, the floored pilot threshold retains at least one eighth of that scale.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
When the pilot scale is nonnegative, the floored pilot threshold is at most one quarter of that scale.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Turning the logarithmic tail exponent into the exact rational-power test used in the finite calibration predicate. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact two-sided bandwidth comparison (C33). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridBranchMeanAggregate 1 declarations Aggregate branch-mean comparison for light cells.
Aggregate branch-mean comparison for light cells.
C31, with explicit overlap-dependent constants. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridCalibrationConstants 7 declarations Existence and readback facts for the paper's least calibration constants.
Existence and readback facts for the paper's least calibration constants.
The dyadic search set is inhabited for every admissible overlap. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The least dyadic index satisfies its defining inequalities. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
The integer search defining Hconst is inhabited. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
All four numerical properties can be read back from the least integer. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Every sample size has polynomial degree proxy at least two.
Proof (Lean source)
Positivity facts needed by every probabilistic leaf follow directly from the finite calibration predicate. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridCellAnalysis 20 declarations Per-cell analysis for the unequal-information Poisson hybrid.
Per-cell analysis for the unequal-information Poisson hybrid.
Independent outcome, pilot, and factorial counts for every arm and cell. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The three-pool marked Poisson law used in the hybrid analysis. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Polynomial statistic in one cell, excluding the pilot decision. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Inverse-count statistic in one cell, excluding the pilot decision. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Pilot-selected contribution of one covariate cell. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Pilot-count configurations selecting the polynomial branch. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Polynomial cell statistic after separating outcome and factorial pools. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Inverse-count cell statistic after separating outcome and factorial pools. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The polynomial branch is square-integrable under its independent outcome and factorial Poisson pools. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The inverse-count branch is square-integrable under its independent outcome and factorial Poisson pools. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact product-law transport which makes the pilot independent of the two estimator pools in a fixed cell. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact per-cell mean decomposition after separating the pilot pool. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact per-cell conditional-mixture variance decomposition. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Each pilot-selected cell contribution has a finite second moment. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Independence across covariate cells turns the variance of the un-clipped hybrid sum into the sum of its cell variances. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Unconditional exact per-cell mean formula, with integrability supplied by the explicit Poisson-polynomial bounds above. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Unconditional exact C27 variance formula for one hybrid cell. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact light-branch mean in a cell. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridDeterministicAbsorption 2 declarations Deterministic C33--C36 absorption of the calibrated hybrid envelope.
Deterministic C33--C36 absorption of the calibrated hybrid envelope.
A purely real-variable version of the final calibrated envelope bound. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Concrete calibrated C33--C36 absorption. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridEventualCalibration 3 declarations Uniform eventual validity of the finite hybrid calibration predicate.
Uniform eventual validity of the finite hybrid calibration predicate.
The elementary logarithmic lower bound used for the rational pilot tail. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Every deterministic calibration test holds for all auxiliary sizes once the labeled size is sufficiently large. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A single finite labeled-size threshold contains every possible calibration failure, uniformly over the auxiliary sample size. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridExponentialAbsorption 3 declarations Deterministic exponential absorption for heavy cells.
Deterministic exponential absorption for heavy cells.
A convenient explicit logarithmic bound for the factorial constant. the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
C22 with the explicit constants chosen by the calibration. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Polynomial forms of the two square-root comparisons in C34. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridHeavyAggregate 3 declarations Aggregate identities and the C30 variance domination for the heavy branch.
Aggregate identities and the C30 variance domination for the heavy branch.
The all-heavy variance is the sum of the independent cell variances. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C30: pilot downweighting can only reduce the all-heavy variance sum. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C30 with the overlap-dependent constant supplied by the all-heavy risk theorem. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridHeavyLightTail 5 declarations The heavy-cell contribution of the mistakenly selected light branch.
The heavy-cell contribution of the mistakenly selected light branch.
Coefficient-L1 control of the Chebyshev continuation outside its fitting interval. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C20, in a form whose extra continuation power is absorbed by C22. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C23 mean part, cellwise: the wrong-light mean retains a factor of cell mass. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C23, cellwise form: the pilot exponential cancels the polynomial growth. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C23 summed over the truly heavy cells, without an alphabet-size factor. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridHeavyMean 4 declarations Exact one-cell expectation and bias bounds for the heavy branch.
Exact one-cell expectation and bias bounds for the heavy branch.
One arm of the inverse-count statistic has finite second moment. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact one-cell identification extracted from the arm calculation in the all-heavy expectation proof. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C18 in the separated-pool notation. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The heavy-cell mean is at most three times the cell mass in absolute value. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridHeavyTransport 8 declarations Transport of the all-heavy statistic to separated arm-count pools.
Transport of the all-heavy statistic to separated arm-count pools.
The outcome and marginal counts separated within every covariate cell. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Product law of the separated outcome and marginal pools. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
All-heavy inverse-count statistic written on separated pools. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Splitting paired counts identifies the heavy product experiment. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Existing all-heavy risk control, transported to separated pools. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridLightAggregate 3 declarations Aggregate-ready second-moment bound for a light cell.
Aggregate-ready second-moment bound for a light cell.
C28 specialized to a cell below the bandwidth. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C21 in the exact separated-pool notation. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Summed C29 envelope over all cells whose mass is at most the bandwidth. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridLightBounds 3 declarations Deterministic and moment bounds for one polynomial (light-cell) branch.
Deterministic and moment bounds for one polynomial (light-cell) branch.
The exact algebraic form of (C16), separated from the probabilistic factorial-moment calculation. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
One arm of the light-cell approximation error, after using overlap to cancel the cell mass against the Chebyshev reciprocal bound. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Two-arm form of (C17). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridLightMoments 5 declarations Exact one-cell identities for the light factorial branch.
Exact one-cell identities for the light factorial branch.
The finite factorial polynomial has a finite second moment under two independent Poisson counts. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The factorial lift is unbiased for the polynomial light-cell continuation. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
One arm's light contribution, separating its marked count from the two factorial arm counts. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Exact mean of one light arm contribution. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact second-moment factorization for one light arm contribution. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridLogSchedule 10 declarations Logarithmic comparisons for the paper's binary degree schedule.
Logarithmic comparisons for the paper's binary degree schedule.
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
The binary length dominates the natural logarithmic scale. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
Conversely, binary length is at most a fixed multiple of log(e n). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
Once the unrounded target degree exceeds two, Ldeg is the floor branch. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Elementary lower and upper bounds for the rounded degree. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The target degree scale eventually exceeds the max/floor transition. the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
A twelfth power of the logarithmic schedule is eventually dominated by the sample size. the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
Consequently the rounded degree has polynomial powers negligible against the sample size. the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
The deliberately small degree constant makes four powers of the factorial-moment base fit below the sample size. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C5's two moment tests hold eventually. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridMeanAssembly 3 declarations Algebraic assembly of the calibrated hybrid mean.
Algebraic assembly of the calibrated hybrid mean.
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C26 with explicit constants. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridPilotAggregate 11 declarations Quantitative pilot-selection probabilities in the exact cell product law.
Quantitative pilot-selection probabilities in the exact cell product law.
Probability that the pilot declares one cell light. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Probability that the pilot declares one cell heavy. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact two-coordinate representation of the pilot probability. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact two-coordinate representation of the complementary pilot event. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C19 before its deterministic exponential absorption. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C24 in the exact cell-product notation. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exponential decay on the binary schedule is at most the corresponding inverse sample-size power. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Under the finite predicate, every truly heavy cell is sent to the light branch with probability at most n⁻¹². the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C25: after multiplication by the heavy-branch bias exponential, the opposite pilot error is uniformly at most n⁻¹². the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
On a truly heavy cell, the intrinsic inverse-count bias exponential is also at most the scheduled inverse power. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridPilotTails 4 declarations Poisson lower-tail leaves for the independent pilot branch.
Poisson lower-tail leaves for the independent pilot branch.
Adding the two arm counts in a pilot cell produces the Poisson law with the summed rate. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Product-law form of the light-selection error bound, at the two arm rates appearing in one pilot cell. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Two-arm pilot-product form of the wrong-heavy-branch estimate. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Reciprocal-power statement of the wrong-heavy-branch estimate (C24). the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridPoolReindex 10 declarations Reindexing the three independent Poisson pools inside one hybrid cell.
Reindexing the three independent Poisson pools inside one hybrid cell.
Evaluate a Boolean-indexed vector in the order false, true. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The two-coordinate finite product is the ordinary product under boolPair. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Split every cell's Boolean-indexed paired coordinates into two Boolean-indexed pools. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Coordinatewise finite-product reindexing for paired arm counts. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Separate a function of arm-indexed triples into its outcome, pilot, and factorial coordinate functions. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Move the middle (pilot) pool in front, leaving outcome and factorial pools together as the estimator input. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Split the three armwise pools and put the independent pilot pool first. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The middle-first permutation preserves the correspondingly permuted three-factor product law. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Finite-product reindexing proves that the outcome, pilot, and factorial pools in one cell are mutually independent. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Combined armwise splitting and middle-pool permutation. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridQuantitativeArithmetic 1 declarations Paper-local deterministic inequalities for the hybrid risk assembly.
Paper-local deterministic inequalities for the hybrid risk assembly.
C17, stated for the exact light mean produced by the Poisson calculation. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridThreePoolPoissonLaw 2 declarations Histogram law of the generic three independent Poisson prefixes.
Histogram law of the generic three independent Poisson prefixes.
Mapping the three generic prefixes to the paper's count tensor gives three independent Poisson histograms in every (x,a) cell. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The preceding histogram law in the paper's markedMass/armMass parameterization. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridThreePoolPrefix 22 declarations The paper's fixed blocks and finite-prefix statistic in the generic three-pool format.
The paper's fixed blocks and finite-prefix statistic in the generic three-pool format.
Forget the dependent-function presentation of three coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Converting a dependent three-pool family to a nested product is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A three-coordinate product measure becomes a nested ordinary product. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Split an array into three consecutive blocks. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
For lengths a, b, and c, the first block of an array at an index is its entry at that index.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
For lengths a, b, and c, the middle block of an array at an index is its entry offset by the first block length.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
For lengths a, b, and c, the last block of an array at an index is its entry offset by the first two block lengths.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Splitting an array into blocks of lengths a, b, and c is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Three consecutive blocks of an iid array are independent iid arrays. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Regroup two independent families by pool and apply each pool map. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Explicit tuple projection for the paper's three fixed pool sizes. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Unpacking hybrid pools for labeled size, auxiliary size, and dimension is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
This declaration defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The complete, pilot, and factorial fixed blocks extracted from the two samples. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Selecting the three hybrid pools for labeled size, auxiliary size, and dimension is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Histograms of a three-pool finite prefix, arranged as the hybrid count tensor. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Forming hybrid count tensors from three finite prefixes is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The clipped hybrid statistic viewed as a statistic of three finite prefixes. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The finite-prefix hybrid statistic at labeled size, auxiliary size, and overlap level is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The extracted fixed blocks have exactly the generic three-pool iid law. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridThreePoolRaoBlackwell 1 declarations Explicit evaluation of the paper's three-pool Rao--Blackwell statistic.
Explicit evaluation of the paper's three-pool Rao--Blackwell statistic.
On calibration, the abstract three-pool conditional expectation is exactly the displayed finite weighted sum defining mixedEstimator. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridThreePoolReadback 1 declarations Readback of the generic three finite prefixes as the paper's block counts.
Readback of the generic three finite prefixes as the paper's block counts.
The three retained generic prefixes read back as exactly the paper's complete, pilot, and factorial block counts. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridVarianceAlgebra 2 declarations Algebraic variance identities for the pilot-selected hybrid statistic.
Algebraic variance identities for the pilot-selected hybrid statistic.
A difference of two arm contributions costs at most twice the sum of their squared contributions. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Clipping to [-1,1] contracts squared loss for a target in that interval. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.HybridVarianceAssembly 2 declarations Algebraic assembly of the calibrated hybrid variance.
Algebraic assembly of the calibrated hybrid variance.
The branch-mean part of C27 on heavy cells is negligible. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
C27--C32, retaining the deterministic quantities used in the final absorption. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.IndependentOuterBlocks 6 declarations Law of two outer blocks selected from a finite iid array.
Law of two outer blocks selected from a finite iid array.
Keep the first and last blocks of an array split into lengths a,b,c. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
For block lengths a, b, and c, the first outer block of an array at an index is the array entry at that index.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
For block lengths a, b, and c, the second outer block of an array at an index is the array entry offset by the first two block lengths.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Selecting outer blocks with lengths a, b, and c is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Concatenating two independent iid arrays gives the iid law on their summed length. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.IndependentPoissonHistogram 6 declarations Local finite-Poisson histogram transport for the inverse-count proof.
Local finite-Poisson histogram transport for the inverse-count proof.
Apply a measurable map to every point of a dependent finite sample. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Applying a map that is measurable to every point of a finite sample is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Finite Poisson samples commute with a measurable pushforward of their observation law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
On a finite alphabet, the histogram of a finite Poisson sample consists of independent Poisson cell counts. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Selecting distinct coordinates from a finite product measure retains the corresponding independent product law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.KnownMarginalBoundary 23 declarations Finite-sample ingredients for the exact-known-marginal benchmark.
Finite-sample ingredients for the exact-known-marginal benchmark.
The inverse-propensity score, written directly in terms of the supplied table. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The clipped empirical mean of the known-marginal inverse-propensity score. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.KnownMarginalLimit 31 declarations This file reparameterizes overlap laws by cell probabilities, propensities, and outcome regressions.
The finite-coordinate bridge for the known-marginal limit
This file reparameterizes overlap laws by cell probabilities, propensities, and outcome regressions. In these coordinates all probabilities and the ATE are polynomial, including at null cells.
Compact variation-independent coordinates for a finite overlap law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
The observed atom probability represented by variation-independent coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The discrete law generated by compact overlap coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Compact coordinates generate a member of the paper's overlap class. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Every overlap law is represented by the compact variation-independent coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The simplex of complete-record atom probabilities in compact coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Labeled-sample atom probabilities in compact coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Auxiliary atom probabilities in compact coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The ATE coordinate, polynomial even at null covariate cells. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The generic finite-side-information values converge on the compact paper coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Bounded measurable estimators on the paper's known-table sample space are equivalent to the promoted measurable ambient exact-table procedures. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The paper's known-marginal minimax risk is exactly the promoted measurable ambient exact-table value in compact coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The paper's two-sample minimax risk is exactly the generic empirical-side minimax value in compact coordinates. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.ParametricCommonMarginalRecipe 8 declarations This file supplies the low-dimensional branch of the common-marginal recipe.
Parametric common-marginal recipe
This file supplies the low-dimensional branch of the common-marginal recipe. Both laws put all covariate mass on the reservoir cell, use propensity one half, and differ only in the treated outcome mean.
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
In the parametric regime, a single occupied reservoir cell gives a common-marginal recipe whose treated means differ by twice the calibrated root-n shift. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The single-reservoir recipe, specialized to the four paper-facing scales, populates a prior handle whenever the parametric branch condition and root-n shift bound hold. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.ParametricLabelFloor 11 declarations The label-gated parametric 1/n minimax lower bound.
The label-gated parametric 1/n minimax lower bound.
From a valid null parametric data-generating process, define its finite discrete observation law.
From a valid perturbed parametric data-generating process, define its finite discrete observation law.
For a valid null process, covariate cell, treatment arm and outcome, the induced joint mass equals the parametric observation mass.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
For a valid perturbed process, covariate cell, treatment arm and outcome, the induced joint mass equals the perturbed parametric observation mass.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
If the dimension is at least two, overlap is positive and below one half, then a valid null process induces a law in the overlap model class.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
If the dimension is at least two, overlap is positive and below one half, then a valid perturbed process induces a law in the overlap model class.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
For a valid null process, the induced average treatment effect is zero.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
For a valid perturbed process, the induced average treatment effect equals the perturbation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A valid null process and its valid perturbation induce identical auxiliary-data marginals.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.PoissonFallingFactorial 11 declarations Paper-local aliases for the raw Poisson falling-factorial identities.
Paper-local aliases for the raw Poisson falling-factorial identities.
A Poisson falling factorial is unbiased for the corresponding power. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A scalar Poisson falling factorial is integrable. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact second cross-moment of two Poisson falling factorials. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact scalar Poisson second moment. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Products of Poisson falling factorials are integrable. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A Poisson falling factorial has every fixed finite second moment. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The overlap coefficient in a joint falling-factorial moment has the exponential-series bound used by the paper. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A finite initial segment of the exponential series at a natural argument is bounded by 3^L. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
One overlap layer of a normalized joint factorial moment is bounded by the corresponding exponential-series layer. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Uniform normalized cross-moment sum for orders at most L. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Product-Poisson L² control for two normalized falling factorials. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.PoissonHybridRisk 6 declarations The unequal-information Poisson hybrid risk bound.
The unequal-information Poisson hybrid risk bound.
The displayed light/heavy statistic on the three independent count pools. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Squared error of the calibrated Poisson hybrid, represented on the explicit independent cell-count experiment. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Clipping and the bias--variance identity reduce calibrated risk to the explicit variance and mean envelopes. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
One constant depending only on overlap controls the calibrated hybrid risk simultaneously for all sample sizes and alphabets. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.PoissonInverseCount 13 declarations Bias and variance of the all-heavy Poisson inverse-count statistic.
Bias and variance of the all-heavy Poisson inverse-count statistic.
Per-cell, per-arm outcome and marginal counts. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Independent outcome/marginal Poisson count law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The all-heavy inverse-count statistic. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Expectation of a statistic under a supplied law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Centered second moment under a supplied law. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The marked mass factors into arm mass and the corresponding outcome mean, including at zero-mass arm cells. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The covariate cell masses sum to one. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Occupied-cell overlap gives the two arm-mass comparisons used in the inverse-count moment calculation. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The elementary exponential envelope used to sum the inverse-count bias over cells without imposing a minimum cell mass. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Summing the exponential envelope gives the dimension-over-intensity part of the inverse-count bias bound. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The same cellwise sum also has its probability-mass cap, yielding exactly the minimum used in the uniform bias estimate. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Absorb the overlap factor in the exponential-envelope bound into a constant depending only on eps, leaving the paper's min 1 (d / t) rate. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Once each arm/cell mean has the Poisson missing-cell envelope, summing the two arm errors gives the complete inverse-count bias bound. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.PoissonInverseCountAssembly 16 declarations Product-measure identities used to assemble the inverse-count risk bound.
Product-measure identities used to assemble the inverse-count risk bound.
The paper-facing count law is definitionally the nested paired-Poisson product used by the tensorized Poincare and factorization lemmas. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The local centered-second-moment wrapper agrees with Mathlib's variance for measurable real statistics. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
An integrand depending on one covariate cell can be integrated against the corresponding inner arm-product law. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A one-arm integrand further reduces to the scalar pair of independent outcome and marginal Poisson counts. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Factorization of the three independent scalar counts in the treated-arm cross term of an inverse-count weight. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Control-arm counterpart of poisson_inverse_cross_moment_true. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Uniform arm-indexed form of the inverse-count cross-moment identity. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The outcome-count part of one arm's inverse-count summand has its Poisson mean divided by the outcome intensity. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Adding one outcome-success count changes only its arm's summand, by the corresponding inverse-count weight. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Adding one marginal count has the two reciprocal increments displayed in the Poincare calculation. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The exact mean of 1 + V / (K + 1), in a multiplied form that remains valid when the denominator-count rate is zero. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Algebraic form of the per-arm expectation calculation. The multiplied reciprocal identity is enough even when the arm mass s vanishes. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Overlap turns the exact missing-cell term for one arm into the exponential cell-mass envelope used by inverse_count_bias_aggregate. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The cellwise variance remainder sums at the marginal-information rate, without any minimum-cell-mass assumption. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Aggregate the two armwise cell variance bounds after the product-measure calculation. The marked masses consume the outcome-information budget, while the squared cell masses consume the marginal-information budget. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The inverse-count statistic and all of its coordinate add-one increments are square-integrable under the nested Poisson law. This packages the polynomial-growth side conditions needed by the tensorized Poincare theorem. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.PoissonInverseCountMarginalEnergy 6 declarations Marginal-count energy and final Poincare assembly for the inverse-count statistic.
Marginal-count energy and final Poincare assembly for the inverse-count statistic.
Factor the squared three-coordinate term in a marginal-count add-one increment. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Factor the one-arm reciprocal term in a marginal-count add-one increment. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Add the two arm orientations of the scalar marginal-count energy bound. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Insert outcome moments into the bidirectional marginal energy estimate. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Rate-weighted marginal-count energy in one covariate cell. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Uniform bias and variance bounds for the independent Poisson inverse-count statistic. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.PoissonInverseCountRiskAssembly 13 declarations Final expectation and variance assembly for the inverse-count statistic.
Final expectation and variance assembly for the inverse-count statistic.
Exact model-specific mean of one arm's inverse-count contribution. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The exact arm mean has the exponential missing-cell envelope under overlap. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Summing the exact arm means gives the paper's uniform inverse-count bias bound before the overlap-dependent factor is absorbed into the final constant. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The scalar arm contribution appearing in the exact expectation assembly. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Product-measure factorization identifies the expectation of the full inverse-count statistic with the sum of its scalar arm means. the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Once product-measure factorization identifies the statistic's expectation with its scalar arm means, the already-proved cell envelopes give the complete uniform bias bound. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The scalar Poisson second moment bound used in the inverse-weight calculation. It follows directly from the add-one Poincare inequality. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Under the arm-overlap rate comparison, the inverse-count weight has a uniform second moment. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Integrating out the outcome-count coordinates leaves exactly the two marginal Poisson counts in the inverse weight. the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Each outcome-count add-one energy is controlled by its marked mass and the outcome-information scale. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.Helpers.StrictImprovement 6 declarations Numerical strict-improvement characterization for the annotation frontier.
Numerical strict-improvement characterization for the annotation frontier.
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.T_BinaryAlphabetParametricRate 1 declarations The binary-covariate parametric endpoint.
The binary-covariate parametric endpoint.
At alphabet size two, auxiliary annotation cannot improve the parametric order. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.T_CommonMarginalConverse 1 declarations The common-treatment-marginal minimax converse.
The common-treatment-marginal minimax converse.
Explicit fuzzy priors with the same entire random (X,A) table force the annotation-frontier lower bound, including the constant-risk regime. The canonical certificate and its fixed transfer constants are consumed internally; the public conclusion exposes only the positive epsilon-dependent constant, the regime-dependent prior handle, equality of its random table laws, and the headline minimax lower bound. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.T_InverseCountBaseline 26 declarations The clipped all-heavy inverse-count upper bound.
The clipped all-heavy inverse-count upper bound.
Bias--variance decomposition for the paper's explicit expectation and variance wrappers. This is the analytic assembly used after transporting the Poisson inverse-count statistic to fixed prefixes. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The bias and variance conclusions of poisson_inverse_count_risk assemble into the squared-risk bound needed by the fixed-prefix transfer. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Valid-prefix all-heavy statistic using the disjoint outcome and factorial blocks and their fixed Poisson intensities. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Clipped, derandomized Poisson-prefix inverse-count estimator. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The clipped inverse-count statistic on two unordered finite Poisson prefixes: complete observations supply the marked numerator counts, while auxiliary observations supply the arm-denominator counts. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions defines the specified object.
Definition (Lean source)
Forming inverse-count histograms from finite prefixes is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The two disjoint fixed pools actually used by the inverse-count estimator. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
Extracting inverse-count pools for labeled size, auxiliary size, and dimension is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The formal statement establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated conditions establishes the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The displayed clipped inverse-count estimator, and hence minimax risk, obey the baseline 1/n+d²/(n+m)² bound. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.T_KnownMarginalBoundary 1 declarations The parametric boundary of the exact-known-marginal experiment.
The parametric boundary of the exact-known-marginal experiment.
The known-marginal minimax risk is uniformly of order 1/n. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.T_KnownMarginalLimit 1 declarations Convergence to the exact-known-treatment-marginal experiment.
Convergence to the exact-known-treatment-marginal experiment.
For fixed labeled size and alphabet, the minimax risk converges to the risk with the exact treatment-covariate table supplied. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.T_SharpAnnotationFrontier 2 declarations Sharp finite-sample and asymptotic annotation-frontier consequences.
Sharp finite-sample and asymptotic annotation-frontier consequences.
The complete finite-sample bracket, known-marginal limit, and three sequence characterizations asserted by the headline theorem. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Definition (Lean source)
The minimax risk has the sharp annotation-frontier rate and exactly the stated known-marginal and sequence-regime consequences. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Stat.STAT_SemisupervisedDiscreteAteAnnotationFrontier_Research.T_UniformMixedUpper 1 declarations Uniform risk bound for the mixed-information hybrid.
Uniform risk bound for the mixed-information hybrid.
One overlap-dependent constant bounds the hybrid's worst-case MSE by the annotation-frontier rate for all n,m,d. the stated conditions the stated conclusion.