Formalization: Second-order Minimax Risk in Multi-arm Binary Randomization
The complete Lean development behind this paper — every definition, lemma, and theorem of its module, including helpers the paper text never cites. Identifiers link within this page, into the Causalean library, or out to the official Mathlib docs.
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Basic 78 declarations Core objects for the unrestricted labeled game, its response-type orbit game, the contrast-weighted first-order procedure, and the rational grid LP.
Core objects for the unrestricted labeled game, its response-type orbit game, the contrast-weighted first-order procedure, and the rational grid LP.
The LP feasibility predicate intentionally has no sign row and no upper bound for its epigraph coordinate. Nonnegativity and attainment are theorem-level consequences handled by the rational LP bridge.
Unrestricted design-and-estimator minimax risk over complete labeled schedules.
Definition (Lean source)
Second-order improvement for the paper's own minimax risk (not an arbitrary sequence).
The cluster-owned minimax-envelope property pinning the improvement to [0,∞).
Orbit risk of a mixture/invariant-estimator pair.
Definition (Lean source)
Minimax value of the finite response-type orbit experiment.
Definition (Lean source)
the contrast norm is positive.
Proof (Lean source)
the q star is nonnegative.
Proof (Lean source)
the q star sums.
One-unit contrast-weighted categorical design.
Definition (Lean source)
The unprojected centered inverse-allocation contrast score.
Definition (Lean source)
Independent contrast-weighted allocation and the clipped centered score rule.
Definition (Lean source)
Exact rational grid-program feasibility. In particular, there is no u ≥ 0 row and no false u ≤ h_c² feasibility clause.
Definition (Lean source)
The raw grid-program value is the infimum feasible epigraph coordinate, with no positivity assumptions imposed at the definition stage.
Definition (Lean source)
Real infimum of the exact rational feasible objective values on n, M ≥ 1.
Definition (Lean source)
The diagnostic three-arm contrast (1,-1/2,-1/2).
Definition (Lean source)
The witness contrast is the centered and normalized three-arm contrast used for the certified separation.
Definition (Lean source)
Three-arm specialization of the rational contrast grid value.
Definition (Lean source)
Three-arm unrestricted minimax risk.
Two-arm contrast (1,-1).
Definition (Lean source)
The canonical two-arm contrast assigns coefficients one and minus one to the two treatment arms.
Definition (Lean source)
The unrestricted two-arm value.
Definition (Lean source)
Airy-rate scaling used only by the cited comparison gates.
Definition (Lean source)
Witness that the conditional second-order branch exists.
Carrier for the paper's positive Airy constant.
Definition (Lean source)
Identification of the Airy constant through a normalized Airy ground state.
Definition (Lean source)
The numerical bracket is benchmark information, separate from the symbol's space.
Definition (Lean source)
State space of the published scalar two-arm experiment.
The scalar triple collection has a finite enumeration.
Definition (Lean source)
Scalar experiment risk is the mean squared estimation error under the fair Bernoulli score experiment.
Definition (Lean source)
The scalar minimax value is the least worst-case scalar experiment risk over all clipped estimators.
Definition (Lean source)
Sudijono, Dobriban, and Tchetgen Tchetgen (2026), Theorems 2.1–2.2 and 3.1, arXiv:2608.13822. This proposition records exactly the scalar reduction and Airy expansion used as secondary context.
Definition (Lean source)
A hull schedule assigns each unit and treatment arm a potential outcome in the unit interval.
A hull estimator maps an assignment and its real-valued observed outcomes to a clipped contrast estimate.
The source optimizes only over estimators measurable in their real data argument.
Definition (Lean source)
The hull target is the population average of the contrast-weighted real potential outcomes.
Definition (Lean source)
Hull risk is the design expectation of squared error for a hull decision at a fixed hull schedule.
Definition (Lean source)
The hull minimax value is the least worst-case hull risk over all hull decisions.
Definition (Lean source)
The hull observation kernel gives the probability of an observed assignment–outcome pair under a hull schedule and assignment design.
Definition (Lean source)
A hull decision combines a finite assignment design with a hull estimator.
The finite maximum in Hull's displayed definition of κ_N.
Definition (Lean source)
Hull's displayed finite min--max constant.
Definition (Lean source)
The independent fair assignment mechanism used by Hull's attaining procedure.
Definition (Lean source)
The positive mathematical content of Hull's Theorem 1 at fixed N, L, and U.
Definition (Lean source)
Bibliographic scope metadata for Hull (2026), Theorem 1. This non-Prop payload records the source boundary without turning a literature-scope judgment into a mathematical premise of this paper.
Definition (Lean source)
Balanced, treatment-label-blinded two-arm assignment designs.
Definition (Lean source)
A procedure is inference-capped when every estimate lies in the natural closed interval determined by the contrast norm.
Definition (Lean source)
A two-arm potential-outcome schedule in Kallus's real conditional-mean model.
The sample-average treatment effect attached to a Kallus schedule.
Definition (Lean source)
Kallus's fixed sample-average-treatment-effect estimator 2 n⁻¹ ⟨W,Yobs⟩.
Definition (Lean source)
A procedure is unbiased for the sample average treatment effect when its expected estimate equals the finite-population contrast target for every response schedule.
Definition (Lean source)
Kallus's worst-case design-dependent variance contribution over conditional means. The extended-real codomain faithfully includes arbitrary unbounded specified classes.
Ordinary MSOD optimality in the balanced label-blinded design class.
Definition (Lean source)
Inference-constrained MSOD optimality among designs satisfying the probability cap.
Definition (Lean source)
The source-specified conditional-mean class, fixed SATE rule, and feasible cap.
Definition (Lean source)
Kallus (2020), Sections 2 and 7, arXiv:2005.03151. This records the two-arm, even-population, balanced label-blinded ordinary MSOD and the separate capped feasible-class MSOD for an arbitrary specified conditional-mean class, fixed unbiased SATE estimator, and significance-linked cap α / 2. The source notes that ordinary MSOD may lack the uniformity needed for Fisher randomization inference; no universal strict separation from the capped class is asserted here.
Definition (Lean source)
A sampling design assigns a probability to every subset of the finite population, with total mass one.
Definition (Lean source)
An estimator sees only the values of sampled coordinates.
Each sample-specific estimator component is measurable, as required by the source.
Definition (Lean source)
A unit’s inclusion probability is the total sampling-design mass of subsets containing that unit.
Definition (Lean source)
Design unbiasedness on the source's bounded finite-population parameter box.
Sampling worst-case risk is the largest mean squared estimation error over all bounded finite-population outcome vectors.
Definition (Lean source)
A sampling design is independent when every subset has the product probability generated by unit-specific inclusion probabilities.
Definition (Lean source)
The source's midpoint-differenced Horvitz--Thompson estimator.
Definition (Lean source)
Aronow and Lopatto (2026), Theorems 1–3, arXiv:2605.20572. This is the cited unit-inclusion, design-unbiased bounded-total statement, not a multi-arm result.
Definition (Lean source)
Scalar prior Bayes risk is the least prior-averaged scalar squared-error risk over all estimators.
Definition (Lean source)
A scalar procedure is balanced Bernoulli when the design is the fair product design and the estimator depends only on the observed score count.
Definition (Lean source)
Decision-theoretic admissibility: no procedure weakly dominates everywhere and strictly somewhere.
Definition (Lean source)
A prior is least favorable for the scalar experiment when it maximizes scalar Bayes risk.
Definition (Lean source)
Source-specific Airy shrinkage and squared-ground-state data.
Definition (Lean source)
The published nonlinear rule X/n - n⁻²ᐟ³ h_A(X/n²ᐟ³).
Definition (Lean source)
The explicit symmetric φ_A² weights from the published lower sequence.
Definition (Lean source)
A scalar prior is exactly the normalized published symmetric φ_A² prior.
Definition (Lean source)
Bibliographic boundary: the cited scalar prior is not lifted by the source to complete response schedules. This metadata is deliberately separate from the source's positive logical carrier below.
Sudijono, Dobriban, and Tchetgen Tchetgen (2026), Theorems 2.1–2.2, 3.1, and C.1–C.2, arXiv:2608.13822. The four positive clauses retained here are: posterior-mean/least-favorable scalar attainment and Bayes-risk equality; scalar/full-game equality with balanced attainment and admissibility; the explicit h_A nonlinear-shrinkage upper sequence; and the explicit symmetric φ_A² scalar-prior lower sequence. The cited prior is on scalar effect-class triples; no complete-schedule lift is asserted here.
Definition (Lean source)
Descriptive, nonassertive payload for the unresolved active-face program.
The active-face boundary-layer handle records the paper’s boundary-layer scaling quantities for a contrast and population size.
Definition (Lean source)
Descriptive, nonassertive payload for the unresolved feedback construction.
The contrast-score feedback handle records the score mean, variance, and shrinkage quantities used in the upper-risk analysis.
Definition (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.BayesInformation 6 declarations Bayesian information inequality over a general σ-finite observation measure.
Bayesian information inequality over a general σ-finite observation measure.
The bundle below exposes the paper's density, support, a.e.-AC, derivative,
differentiation-under-the-integral, finite-information, and joint-integrability
premises without replacing them by everywhere differentiability or an
unweighted T² assumption.
The Bayes joint integral averages an observation field against its likelihood and then against the parameter prior.
Definition (Lean source)
Prior information is the prior expectation of the squared logarithmic derivative of the prior density.
Definition (Lean source)
Fisher information is the joint prior-and-observation expectation of the squared likelihood score.
Definition (Lean source)
All hypotheses stated in the paper for the observation-dependent van Trees bound.
Definition (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the relevant sections are almost everywhere absolutely continuous, Sectionwise absolute continuity turns parameterwise a.e. nonnegativity into a common full-measure set of sections that are nonnegative on the interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The AC-regularity Bayesian Cramér–Rao inequality for a target g(θ,x).
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.EmbeddedTwoArm 39 declarations Paper-local sign-group embedding for the unrestricted two-arm converse.
Paper-local sign-group embedding for the unrestricted two-arm converse.
Half of the contrast's ℓ₁ norm, the scale of the sign-group embedding.
the sign group scale is positive.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the sign group scale squared property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the positive coefficient sums.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the negative coefficient sums.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Coarsen a K-arm assignment to its positive/negative sign group, using a fair coin on zero-coefficient arms.
Embed a two-arm binary schedule by copying its coordinates over the corresponding positive and negative sign groups and fixing inactive outcomes to zero.
The pseudo-observation supplied to the original estimator: retain active-arm outcomes and replace inactive-arm outcomes by the fixed embedded value zero.
Definition (Lean source)
the embedded sign schedule observation property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the embedded sign schedule target property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A fair coin as a finite design.
Definition (Lean source)
The original arbitrary assignment design augmented by independent fair inactive-arm coins.
Definition (Lean source)
the sign latent design e fst property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The original estimator, evaluated on the pseudo-observation and rescaled to the two-arm natural action interval.
Definition (Lean source)
the scaled latent estimator belongs to closed interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Rao--Blackwellize the scaled latent estimator along the deterministic sign-group map.
Definition (Lean source)
Statewise squared risk contracts after sign-group coarsening and rescaling.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the induced two arm procedure worst case risk property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Every unrestricted K-arm procedure induces a no-better two-arm procedure, yielding the sign-group minimax lower bound for arbitrary dependent designs and biased estimators.
Proof (Lean source)
the exists positive contrast arm.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the exists negative contrast arm.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The positive contrast arm property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
The negative contrast arm property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
the positive contrast arm is positive.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the negative contrast arm neg property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the support equals positive negative when cardinality two.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the coefficient equals zero when cardinality two.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the positive contrast arm coeff property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the negative contrast arm coeff property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The two to active assignment property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
The active to two assignment property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
the positive contrast arm ne negative contrast arm property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the active to two two to active property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The active schedule property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
the active schedule observation property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the active schedule target property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The lift two arm procedure property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the lift two arm procedure statewise risk property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the support two upper bound property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.FiniteGame 2 declarations Compact finite-state game separation and saddle-point scaffolding.
Compact finite-state game separation and saddle-point scaffolding.
A least-favorable response-count prior and an optimal orbit procedure form a saddle.
Definition (Lean source)
the finite response-type orbit game admits optimal mixed strategies for both players with a common saddle value.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.FirstOrderUpper 4 declarations The contrast-weighted finite-sample upper risk bound, split out to avoid theorem cycles.
The contrast-weighted finite-sample upper risk bound, split out to avoid theorem cycles.
The upper-bound unit score is the contrast-weighted inverse-probability score used by the explicit first-order procedure.
the upper unit score mean property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the upper unit score second moment property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the contrast weighted procedure upper risk property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.GridApprox 17 declarations Posterior-mean lower certificates and barycenter upper certificates.
Posterior-mean lower certificates and barycenter upper certificates.
Rational probability vectors on response-count orbits.
Definition (Lean source)
Prior predictive mass of an allocation-observation orbit.
Definition (Lean source)
Prior predictive target numerator.
Definition (Lean source)
Posterior-mean Bayes lower certificate for an allocation orbit.
Definition (Lean source)
The unrestricted prior lower certificate B.
Definition (Lean source)
Worst-case risk of a rational allocation mixture and real orbit rule.
Full rational dual multipliers for every equality, nonnegativity, and risk row.
Definition (Lean source)
Decode the row multipliers of the generic rational program into the paper's named normalization, occupancy, sign, and risk multipliers.
Feasibility of all full-dual multipliers and every primal-coordinate stationarity row.
Definition (Lean source)
Objective of the full rational dual in the sign convention of RationalLP.Program.
Definition (Lean source)
Exact rational primal/dual certificate, coupled by full dual feasibility and equal objectives.
Definition (Lean source)
δ is exactly the conditional barycenter Σ_g g w/π, with zero convention.
Definition (Lean source)
the grid resolution is positive, the stated side condition holds, the nearest grid error property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A grid row index pairs an allocation-count vector with a compatible observed-success vector.
The grid row equiv property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
the sums grid rows.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, The generic rational optimizer decodes to the paper's exact primal/dual certificate, and its rational objective is the real grid-program value.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3FullDataRisk000 1 declarations One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the three-arm full data rule risk is at most 000.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3FullDataRisk001 1 declarations One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the three-arm full data rule risk is at most 001.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3FullDataRisk010 1 declarations One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the three-arm full data rule risk is at most 010.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3FullDataRisk011 1 declarations One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the three-arm full data rule risk is at most 011.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3FullDataRisk100 1 declarations One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the three-arm full data rule risk is at most 100.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3FullDataRisk101 1 declarations One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the three-arm full data rule risk is at most 101.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3FullDataRisk110 1 declarations One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the three-arm full data rule risk is at most 110.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3FullDataRisk111 1 declarations One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
One response-type slice of the exact full-data risk certificate.
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the three-arm full data rule risk is at most 111.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3FullDataWitness 3 declarations Assembly of the exact finite full-data three-arm witness.
Assembly of the exact finite full-data three-arm witness.
the three-arm full data rule risk is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm full data rule boundary risk property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm full data rule worst case risk property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3FullDataWitnessBase 23 declarations Definitions for the exact finite full-data three-arm witness.
Definitions for the exact finite full-data three-arm witness.
A three-bit response type is identified with its ordered triple of binary potential outcomes.
The three-arm full data r1 property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
The three-arm full data s1 property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
The three-arm full data sminus property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
The exact three-arm full-data table assigns the certified rational estimate to every binary response triple.
Definition (Lean source)
the c dagger q zero property holds.
the c dagger q one property holds.
the c dagger q two property holds.
the c dagger evaluation property holds.
Proof (Lean source)
the q star design c dagger p property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm full data table scaled belongs to property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the observed count satisfies its stated condition, the clip c dagger equals self.
The three-arm full-data rule clips the certified table value to the natural contrast interval.
Definition (Lean source)
the three-arm full data rule real-valued representation property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The boundary schedule repeats a fixed three-arm response type across the whole population.
Definition (Lean source)
The three-arm full data target q property holds.
The three-arm full data assignment prob q property holds.
The three-arm full data estimate q property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
The three-arm full data risk q property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
the three-arm full data target q real-valued identity property holds.
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm full data assignment prob q real-valued identity property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm full data estimate q real-valued identity property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm full data risk q real-valued identity property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.K3Numerics 3 declarations Exact finite rational witnesses for the three-arm scalar-compression diagnostic.
Exact finite rational witnesses for the three-arm scalar-compression diagnostic.
The full-data rule risk bound is the exact rational certificate used for the three-arm full-information procedure.
Definition (Lean source)
The scalar Bayes certificate is the exact rational lower bound used for the compressed-score experiment.
Definition (Lean source)
the three-arm rational separation property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.OrbitCounting 7 declarations Orbit cardinalities and contingency-table counting identities.
Orbit cardinalities and contingency-table counting identities.
Bounded coordinates summing to n are equivalent to natural coordinates summing to n.
Natural count vectors of total n are the full finite antidiagonal.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, Stars and bars for bounded coordinates whose fixed total makes the bounds automatic.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Allocation counts together with compatible success counts are equivalent to counts of arm/outcome pairs.
Definition (Lean source)
there are at least two treatment arms, The allocation/observation orbit pairs have the stars-and-bars cardinality for 2K arm/outcome cells.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the response count cardinality property holds.
Formal statement
there are at least two treatment arms, the allocation count cardinality property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.OrbitLikelihood 18 declarations The exact rational likelihood of an observed arm-success orbit, obtained by summing multinomial contingency-table counts over the prescribed fiber.
The exact rational likelihood of an observed arm-success orbit, obtained by summing multinomial contingency-table counts over the prescribed fiber.
Joint response-type/arm count induced by a labeled schedule and assignment.
Definition (Lean source)
The contingency-count table records how many units of each response type receive each treatment arm.
Definition (Lean source)
Assignments inducing one fixed response-type/arm contingency table.
Definition (Lean source)
The contingency assignments collection has a finite enumeration.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated contingency-table condition holds, Exact multinomial count of assignments inducing a fixed feasible contingency table.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Labeled assignments with prescribed allocation and observed-success counts.
Definition (Lean source)
The labeled observation assignments collection has a finite enumeration.
Definition (Lean source)
Cardinality of an observed labeled fiber as the contingency-table sum in orbitLik.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The allocation assignments collection has a finite enumeration.
Definition (Lean source)
Exact multinomial cardinality of an allocation orbit.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Observed-success orbit of an assignment already identified with allocation orbit r.
Definition (Lean source)
Regroup a real-valued sum over one allocation orbit by observed-success fibers.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The response-type orbit likelihood, kept over ℚ so coefficient rationality is definitionally visible.
Definition (Lean source)
The labeled observation-fiber ratio is exactly the factorial orbit likelihood.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the labeled observation cardinality ratio equals orbit lik real.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the orbit lik is nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the orbit lik sums obs.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Rational orbit target used by the exact LP.
Definition (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.OrbitRiskBridge 2 declarations Exact finite-sum regrouping from the labeled experiment to the response-type orbit experiment.
Exact finite-sum regrouping from the labeled experiment to the response-type orbit experiment.
The labeled contrast target depends only on response-type counts.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the labeled design realizes the orbit design, the labeled estimator realizes the orbit estimator, Exact risk equality once a labeled procedure has the stated orbitwise design masses and estimator values.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.PermutationFibers 27 declarations Finite fiber permutations and the assignment/observation orbit facts used by the response-type reduction.
Finite fiber permutations and the assignment/observation orbit facts used by the response-type reduction.
Relabeling a schedule by a unit permutation moves each unit’s response type along the inverse permutation.
Relabeling an assignment by a unit permutation moves each unit’s treatment along the inverse permutation.
Relabeling an observed-outcome vector by a unit permutation moves each outcome along the inverse permutation.
Definition (Lean source)
Allocation counts of a labeled assignment.
Definition (Lean source)
the raw assignment count sums.
Formal statement
The assignment-count vector records the number of units allocated to each treatment arm.
Definition (Lean source)
Observed-success counts paired with the allocation orbit of (A,y).
Definition (Lean source)
the raw observed count is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The observed-count vector records the number of observed successes within each treatment arm.
Definition (Lean source)
A permutation obtained by matching corresponding finite fibers.
the stated side condition holds, the fiberwise perm when cardinality equals spec.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Functions with the same fiber cardinalities as a fixed finite function.
Orbit-stabilizer cardinality for a prescribed finite fiber profile.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the assignment counts permute property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the observed counts permute property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Equal allocation counts are exactly equality up to a unit permutation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the prescribed fiber sizes sum to the domain cardinality, Realize prescribed finite fiber sizes by a function on Fin n.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Functions on a finite type with prescribed fiber cardinalities.
Definition (Lean source)
The exact fiber collection has a finite enumeration.
Definition (Lean source)
the prescribed fiber sizes sum to the domain cardinality, Prescribed fibers whose sizes sum to the domain cardinality are realizable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the prescribed fiber sizes sum to the domain cardinality, Multinomial cardinality identity for prescribed finite fibers.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the prescribed fiber sizes sum to the domain cardinality, Rational multinomial formula for the number of functions with prescribed fibers.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the assignment counts surjective property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Prescribed success counts below prescribed allocation counts are jointly realizable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Allocation and success counts classify labeled assignment/outcome pairs up to permutation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Number of labeled assignments in one allocation-count orbit.
Definition (Lean source)
the allocation orbit cardinality is positive.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.RationalContrastApproximation 2 declarations Quantitative rational approximation inside the finite-dimensional zero-sum contrast space.
Quantitative rational approximation inside the finite-dimensional zero-sum contrast space.
there are at least two treatment arms, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the exists rat contrast close.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the coordinate is at most two contrast distance.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.RationalGridCertificateFinite 21 declarations Finite-sample algebra for exact rational grid certificates.
Finite-sample algebra for exact rational grid certificates.
the rational contrast admissible arm count property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the tau count rat real-valued identity property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The rational orbit model uses exact rational orbit likelihoods, contrast targets, and allocation designs.
Definition (Lean source)
A rational response-count prior is interpreted as a real finite probability design.
Definition (Lean source)
Rational grid weights induce a real finite design on allocation-count vectors.
Definition (Lean source)
the posterior residual equals second moment sub.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the posterior residual equals allocation bayes risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the contrast norm rat contrast to real property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the h rat real-valued identity property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the h rat squared equals c0.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the tau count belongs to grid interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid resolution is positive, the gamma mc belongs to grid interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the population size is positive, the posterior mean belongs to grid interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the lower certificate equals posterior residual s inf.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the orbit model minimax equals orbit game value.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the stated side condition holds, the lower certificate is at most rho n.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the delta condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the grid barycenter equals conditional barycenter.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the delta condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the upper certificate is at most grid objective.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid resolution is positive, the delta condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the rho n is at most upper certificate.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the dual vector is feasible, the grid dual objective is at most fixed grid bayes risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, the stated side condition holds, the grid objective is at most lower certificate add mesh.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.RationalLPBridge 41 declarations Exact finite-dimensional encoding of the rational grid program.
Exact finite-dimensional encoding of the rational grid program. The bridge uses rational LP attainment to show that the real infimum is attained at a rational feasible objective value.
The inst decidable equals causal smith.
Definition (Lean source)
The grid-program variable index is the disjoint union of the epigraph coordinate, allocation masses, and allocation–observation–action weights.
The gv equiv property holds.
The gv decode property holds.
the gv dot equals property holds.
Formal statement
The obj coeff property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
the sums obj coeff.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The grid-program row index distinguishes normalization, nonnegativity, occupancy, and risk constraints.
The grid-program row index type is finite.
Definition (Lean source)
The row coeff property holds.
The row bound property holds.
The rational grid program minimizes its epigraph coordinate subject to normalization, nonnegativity, occupancy, and risk inequalities.
A paper-level primal point is encoded as a vector of rational grid-program variables.
Definition (Lean source)
The decoded epigraph coordinate is the grid-program vector’s distinguished scalar entry.
The decoded allocation mass reads the corresponding allocation coordinate of a grid-program vector.
The decoded joint weight reads the corresponding allocation–observation–action coordinate of a grid-program vector.
Definition (Lean source)
the dot norm property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the dot pi is nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the dot w is nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the dot occ property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the dot risk property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the decode encode u property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid program objective encode property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid program objective property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid program feasible if and only if property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the decode encode pi property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the decode encode w property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid program encode feasible property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid lpfeasible u is nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid resolution is positive, the grid lpfeasible exists.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid program bounded below property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, the grid lp rational value exists.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The exact rational representative supplied by rational LP attainment.
Definition (Lean source)
Compatibility name for nonnegativity derived from a risk row.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, A rational optimizer coerces to a real feasible objective value.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, Rational dual multipliers lower-bound every real feasible point.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, the grid lpvalue equals rat.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, Rational LP strong duality supplies a feasible primal/dual pair whose primal objective is exactly the real grid-program infimum.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the dual vector is feasible, Risk-row dual multipliers are nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the dual vector is feasible, With no epigraph sign row, stationarity at u normalizes risk multipliers.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The generic program's dual objective is the difference of the two normalization-row multipliers used by the paper-level decoder.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.ScoreDesign 5 declarations Contrast-score moments and the explicit clipped-shrinkage procedure.
Contrast-score moments and the explicit clipped-shrinkage procedure.
Minimum nonzero normalized response-type score spacing.
The contrast spacing constant is the smallest nonzero absolute normalized response-type score.
Explicit clipped shrinkage applied to the normalized contrast score.
Definition (Lean source)
the lambda c is positive is at most one.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the kappa c is positive.
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.ShrinkageRisk 21 declarations Finite-sample risk improvement of the clipped contrast-score shrinkage rule.
Finite-sample risk improvement of the clipped contrast-score shrinkage rule.
The normalized upper unit score rescales a unit’s contrast-weighted inverse-probability score by the contrast norm.
Definition (Lean source)
The normalized response-type score is the conditional mean of the normalized upper unit score over its treatment assignment.
the normalized upper unit score belongs to closed interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the normalized upper unit score mean property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the normalized upper unit score second moment property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the lambda c is at most abs normalized type score.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the normalized type score squared lower property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the stated side condition holds, the normalized score tail bound property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the finite design cov monotone comp is nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the finite design cov perturbation lower property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the normalized type score belongs to closed interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the clipped score monotone property holds.
the stated side condition holds, the clipped score abs is at most property holds.
Proof (Lean source)
the observed count satisfies its stated condition, the clipped score equals self.
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the observed count satisfies its stated condition, the stated side condition holds, the clipped score sub abs is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the normalized score mean variance property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the normalized score bounds property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the finite design mse shrinkage upper property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the observed count satisfies its stated condition, the shrunken clipped score abs is at most one.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the shrinkage power identities property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the stated side condition holds, the shrinkage procedure risk bound when tail property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.SubsequentialLimits 2 declarations Stability of cluster sets under asymptotically vanishing perturbations.
Stability of cluster sets under asymptotically vanishing perturbations.
For a real sequence, a point is the limit along a strictly increasing subsequence exactly when it is a mapped cluster point at infinity.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
If a real sequence is eventually contained in a closed interval, then its set of limits along strictly increasing subsequences is nonempty and compact.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.Symmetrization 22 declarations Simultaneous unit permutation and exact orbit-procedure correspondence.
Simultaneous unit permutation and exact orbit-procedure correspondence.
Simultaneous invariance of both the assignment law and estimator.
Definition (Lean source)
A procedure is invariant when simultaneous relabeling of units leaves both its assignment probabilities and its estimates unchanged.
Definition (Lean source)
The design and estimator are the stated common-permutation averages.
Definition (Lean source)
The paper's averaged-permutation risk domination, not a pointwise comparison.
Definition (Lean source)
Every labeled procedure has an averaged invariant representative.
Definition (Lean source)
Explicit equations identifying an invariant labeled procedure with (π,δ).
Definition (Lean source)
Exact two-way identification of invariant labeled procedures with (π,δ).
Definition (Lean source)
An allocation representative chooses a canonical labeled assignment for each allocation-count vector.
Definition (Lean source)
the allocation representative spec property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
An observation representative chooses a canonical observed-outcome vector for each compatible allocation and success-count pair.
Definition (Lean source)
the observation representative assignment property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the observation representative counts property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Inflate an orbit procedure uniformly over each labeled allocation orbit.
Definition (Lean source)
the orbit to invariant procedure realizes property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Collapse an invariant labeled procedure to allocation and observation orbits.
Definition (Lean source)
the invariant to orbit procedure realizes property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The explicit equivalence between invariant labeled and orbit procedures.
Definition (Lean source)
the exact invariant procedure correspondence property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The simultaneous permutation average appearing in the paper.
Definition (Lean source)
the permutation average procedure spec property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the permutation average procedure invariant property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
averaging any labeled procedure over unit permutations produces an invariant procedure without increasing worst-case risk, and invariant procedures correspond exactly to orbit procedures.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.TwoArmFinitePosterior 9 declarations Finite-posterior bridge for the paper's effect-triple/binomial experiment.
Finite-posterior bridge for the paper's effect-triple/binomial experiment.
This identifies the generic native-real finite-design Bayes risk with the
paper-local scalarBayesRisk; it is the finite endpoint needed by the smooth
continuous-prior converse.
The effect triple space carries the discrete measurable structure.
Definition (Lean source)
every singleton in the effect triple space is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The count-observation kernel associated with the canonical two-arm score experiment.
Definition (Lean source)
The two arm count kernel construction is a Markov kernel.
Definition (Lean source)
Singleton masses of the count kernel are the statistic masses of the score experiment.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Generic statewise squared loss is exactly the paper-local count-statistic risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Expected count-kernel loss agrees with scalar prior risk after extending a finite estimator.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Restricting an arbitrary natural-number estimator to the finite count support preserves risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The generic finite-posterior Bayes risk of the effect-triple/count kernel is exactly the paper's scalar Bayes risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.TwoArmPosteriorCompatibility 23 declarations Finite effect-count and posterior compatibility algebra for the smooth two-arm prior.
Finite effect-count and posterior compatibility algebra for the smooth two-arm prior.
The effect triple 1 space carries the discrete measurable structure.
Definition (Lean source)
every singleton in the effect triple 1 space is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the effect triple collection is nonempty.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The signed-score average depends only on the retained success count.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm posterior compat sums prod times evaluation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, the two arm posterior compat marginal property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm posterior compat effect target property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the parameter lies in the stated interval, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, the two arm posterior compat mean unit posterior property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the parameter lies in the stated interval, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, the two arm posterior compat first moment property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the parameter lies in the stated interval, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, the two arm posterior compat square completion property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, the two arm posterior compat product formula property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The two arm posterior compat response schedule property holds.
The two arm posterior compat schedule response property holds.
The two arm posterior compat response schedule equiv property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
the two arm posterior compat has effect triple if and only if property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, the stated side condition holds, the two arm posterior compat product equals when effect triple equals.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, the two arm posterior compat smooth effect canonical mixture property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The two arm posterior compat zero assign design property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
the two arm posterior compat zero assign labeled risk property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interval, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, the two arm posterior compat effect risk equals response risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interval, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, the two arm posterior compat error is at most effect risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The smooth two-arm prior measure has the stated density on the parameter interval and is pushed forward to effect-count triples.
Definition (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the two arm posterior compat smooth prior measure is probability property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.TwoArmScheduleKernel 36 declarations
the canonical schedule kernel is nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the canonical score mass sums.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The canonical nu lift property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
The score count adds the positive-effect count to the number of successful zero-effect score bits.
Definition (Lean source)
The two-arm score experiment draws an effect-count triple from the prior and then draws its transformed score count from the induced binomial law.
Definition (Lean source)
the two arm score experiment joint mass property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm canonical score mass equals statistic factor.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The two arm score factorization property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
A transformed score and treatment assignment determine the corresponding observed outcome.
Definition (Lean source)
the score to observed two arm s property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The score full estimator property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
The two-arm effect target is the positive-effect share minus the negative-effect share.
Definition (Lean source)
the two arm score experiment full risk equals property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm score factorization fiber carrier mass property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm score experiment statistic mass property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm score experiment statistic risk equals property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the canonical schedule kernel times squared target property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm score experiment full risk equals labeled.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the canonical nu lift expected risk property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A score-count estimator on the finite support is extended to all natural counts by using zero outside that support.
Definition (Lean source)
the observed count satisfies its stated condition, the extend fin estimator when is less than property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm score experiment statistic risk equals scalar.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm rao blackwell through x property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm contrast norm equals two.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the effect target belongs to two arm range.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The observed score equals the outcome on the first arm and its complement on the second arm.
Definition (Lean source)
The scalar clipped estimator property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
the score full estimator scalar clipped property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Scalar prior risk averages squared error over effect-count triples and the induced binomial score count.
Definition (Lean source)
the scalar prior risk is nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the scalar bayes risk equals s inf scalar prior risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the clipped full risk equals statistic risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the clipped scalar prior risk is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the canonical nu lift clipped risk is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the full schedule bayes risk canonical nu lift equals property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Every effect-triple prior has a complete-schedule lift whose Bayes risk is exactly the scalar binomial-experiment Bayes risk for every assignment law.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.TwoArmScheduleKernelCore 14 declarations Exact transformed-score fibers for the canonical two-arm schedule prior.
Exact transformed-score fibers for the canonical two-arm schedule prior.
This module proves the binomial statistic law, its normalized boundary cases, and the state-independent uniform conditional score kernel used by the Rao--Blackwell assembly.
The two arm score support equiv property holds.
the two arm score support cardinality property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm xmass equals sums score mass.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm canonical score mass property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated probability condition holds, the observed count satisfies its stated condition, the two arm canonical score mass equals binomial.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated probability condition holds, the observed count satisfies its stated condition, the two arm xmass equals binomial when support.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the observed count satisfies its stated condition, the two arm canonical score mass equals zero when is less than.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the observed count satisfies its stated condition, the two arm canonical score mass equals zero when is greater than.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the two arm xmass equals zero when outside.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm xmass equals binomial sums.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the canonical schedule kernel sums.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the two arm canonical conditional score mass property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
has two arm scalar kernel canonical.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the two arm tau equals effect triple.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.TwoArmSchedulePrior 33 declarations Lift of an arbitrary prior on two-arm effect-class triples to complete labeled binary schedules, together with the assignment-ancillary scalar kernel.
Lift of an arbitrary prior on two-arm effect-class triples to complete labeled binary schedules, together with the assignment-ancillary scalar kernel.
Two-arm effect-class counts (p_+,p_-,r_0) summing to n.
The effect triple collection has a finite enumeration.
Definition (Lean source)
An effect prior is a finite probability distribution over two-arm effect-count triples.
Definition (Lean source)
Finite binomial (r,1/2) mass.
Definition (Lean source)
Scalar Bayes risk for X=p_+ + Binomial(r_0,1/2).
Definition (Lean source)
Bayes risk of the complete-schedule lift under a fixed arbitrary design.
Definition (Lean source)
The schedule statistic S_i=Y_i(1) on arm 1 and 1-Y_i(2) on arm 2.
The observable scalar count, retained in its exact support.
Has effect triple.
Definition (Lean source)
The positive, negative, and zero-effect predicates partition the four two-arm response types pointwise.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A schedule in an effect-triple fiber has the advertised three class counts and those counts exhaust the population.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A positive-effect response type contributes one to the transformed score under either assignment arm.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A negative-effect response type contributes zero to the transformed score under either assignment arm.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, On a zero-effect response type, assignment either preserves or flips its common fair bit, exactly as in the paper's schedule construction.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Reconstruct the unique two-arm schedule from its positive and negative effect sets and its transformed score vector.
the positive-effect set has the prescribed cardinality, the negative-effect set has the prescribed cardinality, Disjoint choices drawn respectively from the one and zero coordinates reconstruct a schedule with the prescribed transformed score.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the positive-effect set has the prescribed cardinality, the negative-effect set has the prescribed cardinality, The reconstructed schedule has positive set P, negative set N, and zero-effect set their complement.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Schedules in one fixed effect-triple and transformed-score fiber.
Definition (Lean source)
The two independent subset choices parametrizing a fixed score fiber.
Definition (Lean source)
The two arm score schedule fiber collection has a finite enumeration.
Definition (Lean source)
The two arm score choices collection has a finite enumeration.
Definition (Lean source)
A fixed transformed-score fiber is exactly a pair of subset choices for the positive and negative effect classes.
Definition (Lean source)
The exact number of complete schedules producing a prescribed transformed score vector is the product of the two subset counts.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, The ordered-partition normalizer is the product of the two successive subset-choice counts, including all zero-count boundary cases.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the positive-effect count satisfies its stated condition, the residual count satisfies its stated condition, The factorial identity converting the score-fiber count into its binomial mass, on the exact support p ≤ x ≤ p+r.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The ordered-partition plus independent-fair-bit schedule kernel.
Definition (Lean source)
The canonical kernel mass of one exact transformed-score vector is its score-fiber cardinality divided by the ordered-partition/fair-bit normalizer.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The scalar statistic is exactly the number of true coordinates in the transformed score vector.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated probability condition holds, the observed count satisfies its stated condition, On its exact support, the canonical mass of a fixed transformed-score vector is the binomial mass divided by the number of vectors with that score.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A lift is the actual ν-mixture of the canonical schedule kernels.
Definition (Lean source)
The paper's conditional binomial, assignment-ancillarity, and uniform-S claims.
Definition (Lean source)
Estimator-wise two-stage Rao--Blackwell domination through the scalar count.
Definition (Lean source)
the schedule kernel has the stated scalar representation, Once a complete-schedule lift has the scalar Bayes risk for every assignment law, that scalar risk is a lower bound for the unrestricted two-arm minimax value.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.TwoArmSmoothKernel 9 declarations The measurable Markov-kernel form of the smooth scalar-to-effect-count design.
The measurable Markov-kernel form of the smooth scalar-to-effect-count design. This is the continuous-mixture input used by the finite posterior Bayes-risk bridge.
The smooth kernel effect triple space carries the discrete measurable structure.
Definition (Lean source)
the smooth kernel effect triple measurable singleton property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The zero/zero/n effect-count triple witnesses nonemptiness.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, Every effect-count atom of the clamped smooth response design depends measurably on the scalar parameter.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The smooth scalar response model as a measurable Markov kernel into finite effect-class counts. Clamping makes it a probability kernel for every real parameter.
Definition (Lean source)
The two arm smooth effect kernel construction is a Markov kernel.
Definition (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, At a fixed scalar parameter, the smooth effect kernel is exactly the measure induced by the paper-local finite effect-count design.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, Singleton masses of the smooth effect kernel are the corresponding finite-design masses.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, The prior-induced finite effect-count design has the expected atomwise mixture formula.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.TwoArmSmoothModel 43 declarations Paper-local analytic identities for the smooth two-arm prior.
Paper-local analytic identities for the smooth two-arm prior. These isolate the bandwidth and observation-dependent posterior-target calculations needed by the finite van Trees assembly.
The bandwidth used in the coarse two-arm converse.
Definition (Lean source)
the population size is positive, A positive population size gives a positive converse bandwidth.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, For n ≥ 8, the converse bandwidth is at most one half.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, Squaring the converse bandwidth gives the displayed n^(-2/3) term.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The coefficient of the centered observed score in the posterior target.
Definition (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, On the smooth-prior support, the posterior weight lies between zero and the bandwidth.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The average signed score corresponding to a binary score vector.
Posterior mean of the finite-population effect given the signed score vector.
Definition (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, Derivative of the posterior-weight coefficient inside the regular Bernoulli region.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, Derivative identity for the observation-dependent posterior target.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
One response type under the smooth two-arm prior at fixed scalar parameter. The two nonzero-effect types have masses (a±θ)/2, while each zero-effect type has mass (1-a)/2.
Definition (Lean source)
The signed Bernoulli score extracted from one response type at a fixed arm.
The signed unit-level treatment effect carried by a two-arm response type.
One signed Bernoulli score with mean θ.
Definition (Lean source)
the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The joint score/effect numerator under one smooth response type equals the Bernoulli score mass times its posterior mean effect, for either assigned arm.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, Pushing the smooth response-type law through either assigned arm gives the same Bernoulli score mass (1±θ)/2; this is the one-unit ancillarity identity used by the continuous-to-finite mixture bridge.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Effect-class counts induced by a vector of four two-arm response types.
Definition (Lean source)
The target of the response-vector effect counts is its positive-minus-negative effect count divided by the population size.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Projection of a scalar parameter onto the response-design validity interval.
the parameter lies in the stated interval, the two arm clamped parameter abs is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, the two arm clamped parameter equals property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The smooth scalar model's independent response vector, pushed to its finite effect-class counts.
Definition (Lean source)
Independent signed Bernoulli scores for the n labeled units.
Definition (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The one-unit signed score has expectation θ.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The average signed score in the finite Bernoulli experiment has expectation θ.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The supplied derivative field for the observation-dependent posterior target.
Definition (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, Averaging the target derivative removes its centered-score term.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Product likelihood of the signed Bernoulli score vector.
The product-rule derivative of the signed Bernoulli likelihood.
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, On the Bernoulli parameter space, the explicit likelihood is the product-design mass.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, Every signed Bernoulli vector has nonnegative mass for |θ| ≤ 1.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The signed Bernoulli vector likelihood is normalized.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The displayed product-rule field is the likelihood derivative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The ordinary score of the signed Bernoulli product likelihood in its positive region.
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, In the regular Bernoulli region, likelihood derivative equals likelihood times score.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The one-coordinate Bernoulli likelihood score is centered.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The one-coordinate Bernoulli likelihood score has information 1/(1-θ²).
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The independent n-coordinate score has Fisher information n/(1-θ²).
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, Every score vector has strictly positive likelihood in the open Bernoulli region.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The promoted guarded likelihood score agrees with the ordinary product score.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The exact finite counting-measure Fisher information is n/(1-θ²).
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, On the smooth-prior support, the averaged posterior-target derivative is at least 1-a.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, On |θ| ≤ a/2, Bernoulli product information is bounded by its value at the edge of that interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.TwoArmVanTreesAssembly 5 declarations Assembly of the finite van Trees regularity record for the smooth two-arm model.
Assembly of the finite van Trees regularity record for the smooth two-arm model.
every finite-coordinate section satisfies the stated regularity condition, Sectionwise measurability on a finite discrete carrier gives product almost-everywhere strong measurability.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, The joint guarded-score square is integrable in the smooth two-arm model.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, Estimator error times the joint guarded score is integrable by weighted Young's inequality and the two square-integrability results.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, The derivative-balance field is integrable because it is the error-score field minus the already integrable sensitivity field.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, All finite-experiment regularity conditions for the smooth two-arm Bernoulli likelihood and its observation-dependent posterior target.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.Helpers.TwoArmVanTreesModel 27 declarations Regularized likelihood identities for the smooth two-arm van Trees model.
Regularized likelihood identities for the smooth two-arm van Trees model.
The clamp only controls the likelihood outside the ambient parameter interval;
inside (-1,1) the model and its derivative are exactly the Bernoulli product
likelihood used by the paper.
The Bernoulli product likelihood with its scalar parameter clamped to [-1,1].
Definition (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, In the regular Bernoulli region the clamped likelihood is the ordinary product likelihood.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The regularized product likelihood is nonnegative for every real parameter.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, In the regular region the finite likelihood masses sum to one.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, In the regular region the likelihood has unit mass under counting measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Every section of the finite regularized likelihood is counting-measure integrable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Every section of the displayed finite likelihood derivative is counting-measure integrable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, Inside (-1,1), the displayed product-rule field differentiates the regularized likelihood.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, Every score vector has positive regularized likelihood in the open Bernoulli region.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The displayed derivative masses are centered in the open Bernoulli region.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, The counting integral of the displayed derivative vanishes in the regular region.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interior interval, Differentiation passes through the finite counting integral in the regular region.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Every regularized Bernoulli likelihood section is absolutely continuous on the ambient parameter interval used by the smooth prior.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The observation-dependent posterior target is absolutely continuous on the same ambient interval, which stays uniformly away from its poles.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
every finite-coordinate section satisfies the stated regularity condition, A real field on an interval times a finite discrete carrier is integrable when each of its finitely many interval sections is integrable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
every finite-coordinate section satisfies the stated regularity condition, Sectionwise continuity on a compact interval implies integrability over that interval times any finite discrete carrier.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The regularized product likelihood has the advertised derivative almost everywhere on the ambient parameter/counting product measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The supplied posterior-target derivative is valid almost everywhere on the ambient parameter/counting product measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Each regularized Bernoulli likelihood section is continuous on the ambient parameter interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The displayed posterior-target derivative is continuous on the ambient interval, which stays away from both poles.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, The smooth-prior sensitivity field is integrable over the ambient parameter interval and finite score carrier.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, Every finite estimator gives an integrable smooth-prior squared-error field for the observation-dependent posterior target.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
On the ambient parameter interval, every guarded likelihood-score section is continuous because every Bernoulli product mass is strictly positive.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, The smooth-prior weighted likelihood-score square is integrable on the ambient parameter interval times the finite score carrier.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, Each finite score section of the lifted smooth-prior score square is integrable on the ambient parameter interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, The smooth-prior weighted prior-score square is integrable after lifting to the finite Bernoulli score carrier.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, The smooth-prior weighted cross product of the prior and likelihood scores is integrable on the parameter--score product space.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_attainment_and_k3_certified_converse 6 declarations Capstone: exact support-two saddle, universal order attainment, and certificates.
Capstone: exact support-two saddle, universal order attainment, and certificates.
A prior on response-type counts induces a prior on labeled schedules by spreading each count-vector mass uniformly over its schedule orbit.
Definition (Lean source)
the schedule prior when count prior e count property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the schedule prior when count prior e permute property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the orbit saddle labeled bayes lower property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The attainment and three-arm certified converse scope property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
there are at least two treatment arms, the orbit game attains its saddle value, the universal second-order rate is achieved, and the certified three-arm converse establishes the stated strict separation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_coarse_two_arm_minimax_lower 12 declarations Fully internal smooth-prior two-arm minimax lower bound.
Fully internal smooth-prior two-arm minimax lower bound.
The effect triple 2 space carries the discrete measurable structure.
Definition (Lean source)
every singleton in the effect triple 2 space is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the effect triple 1 collection is nonempty.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, Mixing the smooth scalar-to-effect kernel and then evaluating count squared loss is exactly the squared risk under the induced finite effect-count prior.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, The continuous smooth-mixture Bayes risk is the paper's scalar binomial Bayes risk for the induced finite effect-count prior.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, The observation-dependent posterior target is constant on every retained-count fiber.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the parameter lies in the stated interval, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, Every estimator of the signed Bernoulli score vector has smooth-prior posterior-target error at least the displayed finite van Trees fraction.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, The elementary n ≥ 8 estimate converting the smooth-prior fraction to the advertised coarse n^{-4/3} lower bound.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the parameter lies in the stated interval, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the two arm posterior compat fraction is at most mixed loss.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first arm count satisfies its stated condition, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the two arm posterior compat mixed loss clip is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the parameter lies in the stated interval, the second arm count satisfies its stated condition, the two arm posterior compat fraction is at most two-arm minimax risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the two-arm minimax risk obeys the stated finite-sample lower bound obtained from the smooth-prior Bayesian information inequality.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_contrast_risk_continuity 13 declarations Finite-sample Lipschitz continuity of square-root minimax risk.
Finite-sample Lipschitz continuity of square-root minimax risk.
The distance between two contrasts is the largest absolute difference between their response-type scores.
Definition (Lean source)
the contrast type score sub abs is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the tau c sub abs is at most contrast distance.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the tau c belongs to natural interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the finite design e abs is at most sqrt e squared.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the finite design root mse triangle const property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the dual vector is feasible, the clip squared dist is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A procedure for one contrast transfers to another by applying the original procedure and clipping its output to the new contrast range.
the population size is positive, the transferred root risk is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the sqrt worst case risk equals property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the sqrt rho n equals root minimax.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the root minimax one sided contrast is at most property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
there are at least two treatment arms, the population size is positive, the square root of finite-sample minimax risk is Lipschitz continuous in the contrast under the response-type score distance.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_embedded_two_arm_converse 1 declarations Sign-group embedding of the unrestricted two-arm decision problem.
Sign-group embedding of the unrestricted two-arm decision problem.
there are at least two treatment arms, the population size is positive, every multi-arm problem contains a scaled two-arm sign-group subproblem, yielding the stated two-arm minimax lower bound.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_exact_response_type_game 1 declarations Exact lossless reduction of the labeled game to response-type orbits.
Exact lossless reduction of the labeled game to response-type orbits.
there are at least two treatment arms, the labeled finite-population minimax game and its response-type orbit game have exactly the same value.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_first_order_saddle 7 declarations First-order minimax constant and contrast-weighted upper procedure.
First-order minimax constant and contrast-weighted upper procedure.
The first-order unit score is the contrast-weighted inverse-probability score under the contrast-optimal assignment law.
the first order unit score mean property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first order unit score second moment property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the contrast weighted procedure risk property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the contrast has admissible arm count property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the first order minimax limit property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the contrast-weighted design and estimator attain the asymptotic first-order minimax constant, and the matching lower bound makes this constant a saddle value.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_k3_grid_certificate_sandwich 1 declarations Three-arm specialization of the exact rational certificate sandwich.
Three-arm specialization of the exact rational certificate sandwich.
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, the three-arm specialization inherits the exact rational lower-and-upper grid certificate sandwich.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_k3_lp_certificate 3 declarations Finite exact-rational three-arm LP certificate.
Finite exact-rational three-arm LP certificate.
the population size is positive, the three-arm tau count rat squared is at most one.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, the grid lpvalue three-arm is at most one.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, the exact three-arm linear program has the stated certified value and primal–dual witness.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_k3_scalar_score_not_minimax_preserving 38 declarations Exact early diagnostic showing scalar sign-score compression loses information.
Exact early diagnostic showing scalar sign-score compression loses information.
The three-arm signed score assigns the contrast coefficient to a response type according to its active outcome pattern.
Definition (Lean source)
The three-arm mean level is the average signed score under a response-type distribution.
Definition (Lean source)
The five possible scalar score means {-1,-1/2,0,1/2,1}.
Definition (Lean source)
Risk in the five-level scalar score experiment, distinct from the two-arm triple game.
Definition (Lean source)
Minimax value of the genuine five-level scalar score experiment.
Feasible absolute total of n five-level scalar means.
Definition (Lean source)
The scalar moment minimum is the least attainable second moment among distributions with the prescribed mean level.
Definition (Lean source)
the three-arm mean level squared is at least half abs.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm mean level squared is at least three abs sub one.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid resolution is positive, The two pointwise scalar inequalities give both branches of the local wedge.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid resolution is positive, Every feasible total of five-level means is a nonnegative half-integer.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the low-level index satisfies its stated feasibility condition, Below the corner, half-level coordinates attain the scalar wedge.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the high-level index satisfies its stated feasibility condition, Beyond the corner, a mixture of half-level and unit coordinates attains the wedge.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid resolution is positive, The explicit half-level/unit configurations attain the lower wedge bound.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the grid resolution is positive, Exact scalar moment wedge over every feasible half-integer total.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The signed score has the response-type mean stated in the scalar reduction.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The signed score is unit-valued, so its variance is one minus its squared mean.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The average signed-score mean is exactly the three-arm contrast target.
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, Independence across units turns the signed-score variances into the exact average MSE.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The exact three-observation scalar rule from the finite minimax calculation.
The exact scalar rule stays in the natural target interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The Bernoulli score law with mean equal to the selected five-level parameter.
Definition (Lean source)
Independent three-coordinate score law for a vector of scalar means.
Definition (Lean source)
the three-arm scalar bool design mean property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm scalar bool design var property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The explicit linear scalar rule has risk at most 1 - sqrt 3 / 2 at every state.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The explicit scalar rule gives the upper half of the exact three-score minimax value.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Exact least-favorable weights on the five homogeneous scalar states.
The three-arm scalar prior risk property holds.
Definition (Lean source)
Coordinate equivalence used to evaluate the scalar three-coordinate certificate.
the three-arm scalar least favorable weight is nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm scalar least favorable weight sums.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Posterior square completion for the exact five-state scalar prior.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm scalar rule homogeneous risk property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm scalar prior risk rule property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the three-arm scalar prior risk lower property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The exact prior gives the lower half of the scalar minimax calculation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
for the certified three-arm contrast, compressing the full data to the scalar signed score strictly increases the minimax risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_multiarm_strict_extension 13 declarations Scope comparison: exact binary orbit games for every fixed arm count.
Scope comparison: exact binary orbit games for every fixed arm count.
A common carrier in which schedule domains with different arm counts can be compared.
Definition (Lean source)
Extend a two-arm bounded-outcome schedule by zero outside its two treatment arms.
Definition (Lean source)
Extend a binary K-arm schedule by zero outside its treatment-arm domain.
Definition (Lean source)
Hull's bounded two-arm schedule domain, embedded in a common real schedule space.
Definition (Lean source)
The present paper's binary K-arm schedule domain in the same ambient space.
Definition (Lean source)
the two arm contrast c0 property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the two arm second order lower witness property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
there are at least two treatment arms, the population size is positive, the stated side condition holds, the hull not subset binary property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Every two-arm binary response schedule is one of the four response types that remain separately indexed in the orbit likelihood.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The four two-arm response types are pairwise distinct.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, For the contrast (1,-1), only the positive- and negative-effect response types contribute to the orbit target.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The multi-arm strict extension scope property holds.
with at least three active contrast arms, the multi-arm response-schedule hull strictly contains the binary two-arm subclass while retaining the stated second-order lower witness.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_rational_contrast_grid_certificate_sandwich 5 declarations Exact rational primal/dual certificates and their asymptotic sandwich.
Exact rational primal/dual certificates and their asymptotic sandwich.
A choice, at every positive population size, of the exact primal/dual grid certificate and its barycenter procedure.
Definition (Lean source)
The actual certificate gaps vanish at every scale dominated by the squared grid resolution; conditionally on a normalized minimax limit, both certificate improvements have the same limit. The final clause records explicitly the paper's universal a_n = n^(4/3), M_n = n specialization.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the select rational grid certificate sequence property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the rational grid certificate asymptotics proof property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, for a rational contrast, the finite grid lower and upper certificates sandwich the minimax excess risk and become asymptotically sharp as the mesh vanishes.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_real_contrast_grid_certificate_transfer 18 declarations Transfer of exact rational finite-program certificates to real contrasts.
Transfer of exact rational finite-program certificates to real contrasts.
The full-data rule uses exactly pi's uniform allocation-orbit lift and the projection of the same upstream barycenter delta.
Definition (Lean source)
Cardinality of the labeled-schedule orbit having response counts m.
Definition (Lean source)
the response count orbit cardinality is positive.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the response count fiber cardinality property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the schedule counts permute equals property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A rational prior on response-count orbits induces a labeled schedule prior by spreading each orbit mass uniformly over its schedules.
Definition (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the schedule prior when rational prior permute property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the schedule prior when rational prior e permute property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the schedule prior when rational prior e count property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the stated side condition holds, the lower certificate is at most schedule prior risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the lower certificate is nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the stated side condition holds, the transferred schedule prior lower bound property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, the delta condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the projected upper procedure certificate property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The schedule prior is exactly the uniform-within-orbit lift of the same upstream rational response-count prior nu, and gives the all-procedure bound.
Definition (Lean source)
One exact rational program together with its transferred real-contrast endpoints.
Definition (Lean source)
the population size is positive, the grid resolution is positive, the fixed real contrast transfer certificate property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the real contrast transfer certificate bounds property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
there are at least two treatment arms, exact rational grid certificates transfer to every real contrast with the stated approximation error bounds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_second_order_rate_and_certificate_frontier 14 declarations Established second-order rate and the finite-program certificate frontier.
Established second-order rate and the finite-program certificate frontier.
The open-frontier record lists the second-order and certificate questions not settled by this development.
Definition (Lean source)
A real number is a cluster value of a sequence when some subsequence converges to it.
Definition (Lean source)
A positive sequence is slowly varying when its ratio at every fixed positive rescaling of the index converges to one.
Definition (Lean source)
Slow variation for the actual normalized improvement, requiring positivity only eventually.
Two real sequences are asymptotically coincident when the absolute difference between their terms converges to zero.
The positive second-order scale replaces the zero-index value of the regularly varying scale by one.
Definition (Lean source)
The eventual-positivity patch replaces nonpositive terms of a real sequence by one.
Definition (Lean source)
the observed count satisfies its stated condition, the eventually positive patch eventually equals property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the second order scale positive regularly varying property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the parameter lies in the stated interval, the stated side condition holds, the regularly varying divided by property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the stated side condition holds, the asymptotically coincident when scaled sandwich property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the second order scale mesh converges zero.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A rational certificate cluster is a subsequential limit of scaled exact rational lower and upper grid certificates whose mesh error vanishes.
Definition (Lean source)
there are at least two treatment arms, the contrast has at least three active arms, the scaled second-order excess risk has a nonempty compact cluster set bounded away from zero and above by the stated constant; any convergent positive regularly varying normalization has exponent four thirds, while the exact grid-certificate identification remains an explicit open frontier.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.T_universal_second_order_rate 6 declarations Universal n^{-4/3} second-order improvement.
Universal n^{-4/3} second-order improvement.
A positive sequence is regularly varying with exponent beta when its value at every fixed positive rescaling is asymptotic to the rescaling factor raised to beta times its original value.
the comparison sequence is eventually positive, the ratio sequence is positive, the stated dyadic bounds hold, the dyadic ratio converges to one, A positive sequence bounded above and away from zero cannot have a non-unit doubling-ratio limit.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The polynomial prefactor in the local shrinkage tail error is dominated by the stretched-exponential decay.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the population size is positive, The second-order scale exactly cancels its reciprocal power at positive sample sizes.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The contrast-weighted procedure supplies the minimax envelope, including the degenerate zero-unit experiment.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
there are at least two treatment arms, the contrast-score shrinkage procedure improves on the first-order risk by order uniformly over response schedules.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
CausalSmith.Experimentation.EXP_MultiarmSecondorderMinimaxFrontier_Research.World 58 declarations Shared finite-population objects for the multi-arm second-order minimax frontier.
Shared finite-population objects for the multi-arm second-order minimax frontier.
The paper works with complete binary response schedules and arbitrary finite assignment designs. This module contains only the common carriers and exact finite-sum constructions; theorem claims live in the planned theorem files.
The treatment-arm set in a -arm experiment consists of the arm labels.
Definition (Lean source)
The unit set in a population of size consists of the unit labels.
Definition (Lean source)
A binary response type assigns a potential-outcome bit to every treatment arm.
A complete binary response schedule assigns a response type to every unit.
An assignment allocates one treatment arm to every unit.
An observed-outcome vector records one binary outcome for every unit.
A nonzero, zero-sum contrast.
Definition (Lean source)
The contrast forall arm object can be evaluated as its underlying function.
Definition (Lean source)
The paper's standing arm-count domain.
Definition (Lean source)
Positive natural indices used by the paper's finite-population LPs.
Definition (Lean source)
A positive nat nat value has its natural numerical representation.
Definition (Lean source)
Real nonzero zero-sum contrasts, as opposed to the generic algebraic helper.
Definition (Lean source)
The active support of a contrast.
The contrast ℓ1 norm.
Definition (Lean source)
Contrast-weighted arm allocation.
The fixed potential outcome of unit i under arm a.
Observed outcomes under a realized assignment.
Definition (Lean source)
The finite-population contrast target.
Definition (Lean source)
Clipping to the natural contrast range.
the clipped estimate lies in the natural closed interval from minus one half to one half of the contrast norm.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
An arbitrary clipped, possibly biased estimator.
A decision procedure pairs an arbitrary assignment law and a clipped estimator.
Definition (Lean source)
Design-based squared error of a procedure at a fixed schedule.
Definition (Lean source)
First-order risk constant.
A response-type count vector with total population size n.
An arm-allocation count vector with total population size n.
Arm-specific observed-success counts compatible with r.
A response-type by arm contingency table.
The count vec collection has a finite enumeration.
The alloc vec collection has a finite enumeration.
The obs vec collection has a finite enumeration.
The exact feasible contingency-table fiber.
Definition (Lean source)
Orbit form of the contrast target.
The raw schedule count is the number of units having a specified response type.
Definition (Lean source)
the raw schedule count sums.
Formal statement
The response-type orbit of a labeled schedule.
Definition (Lean source)
An invariant estimator is indexed by allocation and success-count orbits.
An orbit procedure is a mixture over allocation orbits and an invariant estimator.
Definition (Lean source)
Rational contrasts used by the exact grid programs.
Definition (Lean source)
the rat contrast nonzero real property holds.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
the rat contrast sums zero real.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A rational contrast is embedded into the real contrast space by interpreting each coefficient as a real number.
Definition (Lean source)
Rational ℓ1 norm and half-range.
Definition (Lean source)
The rational half-range is one half of the rational contrast norm.
Definition (Lean source)
Contrast-scaled rational action grid.
Definition (Lean source)
A rational grid design assigns a rational mass to every allocation-count vector.
Definition (Lean source)
A grid weight assigns a real joint design-and-action mass to every allocation count, compatible success count, and grid action.
Rational coordinates used to certify a paper-facing real grid weight.
Coordinatewise cast from an exact rational certificate to the paper-facing weight.
Definition (Lean source)
Every joint design--action coordinate lies in the paper's unit interval.
Definition (Lean source)
The rational certificate representation only needs the sign row explicitly; the occupancy equations and simplex constraint imply the upper bound.
Definition (Lean source)
The two-arm response type (1,0).
Definition (Lean source)
The two-arm response type (0,1).
Definition (Lean source)
The positive-effect coordinate of the full four-count orbit vector.
Definition (Lean source)
The negative-effect coordinate of the full four-count orbit vector.
Definition (Lean source)
The zero-effect count, represented as the complement of the two distinct effect coordinates in the complete four-count orbit vector.
Positive normalizers used in conditional second-order statements.
Definition (Lean source)
The positive sequence forall nat real object can be evaluated as its underlying function.